In the "old days" established companies ferguson enterprises IT departments because there would be no one to set up, operate and operate computer engines. As slid operation of them onto PCs so that part disappeared from the IT department, but they should still be set up and operated. Then the hardware and operation.
"We need someone to acquire servers and keep it running." But today, it will typically be better and cheaper to purchase the service from a hosting provider. The only thing you need is itself a computer and Internet access.
"We need someone to develop systems for our specific needs." Today, systems for virtually every need available as SaaS or letkonfigurerbare open source systems. If you need to create a website, you will find just the CMS that suits you best and get someone to install it or buy it in a SaaS version.
"We need support." When everything is networked to all support made over the net with screen-sharing technologies. It is not necessary to send a technician out and look at the PC. Obviously, it would still be necessary to send a technician out once in a while, but it is not necessary that he comes from the IT department.
The IT department then has been abolished, we will experience a semi-chaotic ferguson enterprises time with systems with overlapping functionality, security breaches, "outages" and an integration chaos I some years ago described ferguson enterprises as "cloud spaghetti". There will be a combinatorial explosion when the various services will be connected in point integrations. It will quickly become unmanageable.
Therefore, you will find out that there may still be the need for an IT department and it will be resurrected in a new form. For although each job can be done by anyone inside ferguson enterprises or outside the organization, so there is a need for a device to have an overview and manage IT. The core tasks will be:
Acquisition - There must be someone who can match suppliers, some who can get the right. It may be consultants helps, but there must be someone responsible for implementing acquisitions with a strategy.
Security and user management-if the confidentiality, integrity and availability is important (and it is), there are some who need to think about how to ensure. IT security ferguson enterprises will probably change, but it will become more important in the future. The same with user control of how to ensure that employees who have switched to competitor would still have access to the company's SaaS suite if there is a central location to ensure ferguson enterprises it?
On Version2 Datacenter Conference on 13 March, you can network with other IT people and be sharp on data center solutions and gain knowledge on how to select the right data center strategy. Read more about the conference and register here. Send Tweet
Depending on the size of the company, the IT department to a large extent still be relevant long time to come, even though it may be, with very few men who makes sure to buy the right services ferguson enterprises from different cloud providers.
To start with the most essential. When / if an IT supplier goes bankrupt, it can be a very difficult task to obtain the customer's data and systems. This would be done in consultation with a trustee in bankruptcy.
Additionally, ferguson enterprises there are several examples of Outsourcing companies like TDC Hosting, CSC etc. Not complied with standard IT protocols by which IT security of their customers has been compromised. One of the worst examples was the lack of patching of the National Police IT systems that Deloitte had to give red crosses in the audit report.
Smaller companies without complex production and advanced business processes are relatively easy to Outsource their data and systems. But in the case of companies with great dynamics that often transform the processes of change, or at all places great demands on adaptability, you have to be very careful.
My philosophy is that an IT department ferguson enterprises (in a medium or large business) ALWAYS be run better and cheaper than an Outsourced solution. It simply requires that you have a skilled IT management who understand the business. Unfortunately too many examples of IT managers and CIOs with fine papers in the luggage that does not know how to merge IT and business.
My philosophy is that an IT department (in a medium or large business) ALWAYS be run better and cheaper than an Outsourced solution. It simply requires that you have a skilled IT management who understand ferguson enterprises the business. Unfortunately too many examples of IT managers and CIOs with fine papers in the luggage that does not know how to merge IT and business.
In line here - the benefits of in-house IT can be much greater ferguson enterprises than the best results achieved by outsourcing. It only makes sense to outsource if you can not find out how to operate its IT department and then you have greater challenges than outsourcing itself can solve.
There is probably no outsourcing of
No comments:
Post a Comment