Regulation A19 Judgement | Police Superintendents Association of England and Wales
Home About Us History Vision, Mission and Values National Office NEC Structure Rules Hospitality Register Annual Report FAQ’s News PSAEW Blog Pay & Pensions Pay News Pensions News Conditions and Allowances FAQ’s Events Events News Annual Conference Membership Briefing Days Retirement Seminars Other Events Members Members News Products Toolkit Healthcare applique market Branch Officials Professional Standards Careers/Training College of Policing FAQ’s Contact
On Wednesday applique market 5 th February 2014 the PSAEW received the judgement from the Employment Tribunal judges in respect of the ET claims that we lodged on behalf of five ex-members who were compulsorily retired by the application of Regulation A19 (Police Pension Regulations) nearly two years ago. A copy of the full judgement is linked below.
The ET Judges have unanimously ruled that the application of Regulation applique market A19 against our former members in Devon and Cornwall, West Midlands, applique market North Wales, South Wales and Nottinghamshire was “ not a proportionate means of pursuing a legitimate objective ” applique market and that our ex-members were all unlawfully discriminated against on the grounds of their age.
This is a very welcome judgement, but in many ways there are no winners. All of the five ex-members concerned were forced to retire against their wishes when at the pinnacle of their careers and receiving outstanding appraisals for their performance. Some of them have not worked since being forced to retire.
The Chiefs concerned now have an opportunity to consider the 75 page judgement with their legal advisers and they have the right to appeal or seek to settle these claims. There are a further 22 cases which we have registered on behalf of ex-members which were “stayed” pending the result of the test cases which can now proceed.
Twitter: policesupers applique market RT @SolPolCommander : @policesupers thanks for opportunity to influence - contributed my thoughts to both #diversity surveys #LGBT #WomenInP 06:49:27 PM April 17, 2014 from Tweetbot applique market for iOS Reply Retweet Favorite applique market RT @barrackslass : Looking forward to my day with @policesupers from @iompolice : @ChInspSimonLowe & Kevin Willson, also mtgs with @CCGaryRob 08:06:33 AM April 17, 2014 from Tweetbot for iOS Reply Retweet Favorite RT @PoliceP : Forces in handcuffs over lack of radical restructure says @barrackslass http://t.co/HSIY4ab6YI 11:53:16 AM April 16, 2014 from Tweetbot for iOS Reply Retweet Favorite
Archives April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012
Designed & Developed by adrich
Home About Us History Vision, Mission and Values National Office NEC Structure Rules Hospitality Register Annual Report FAQ’s News PSAEW Blog Pay & Pensions Pay News Pensions News Conditions and Allowances FAQ’s Events Events News Annual Conference Membership Briefing Days Retirement Seminars Other Events Members Members News Products Toolkit Healthcare applique market Branch Officials Professional Standards Careers/Training College of Policing FAQ’s Contact
On Wednesday applique market 5 th February 2014 the PSAEW received the judgement from the Employment Tribunal judges in respect of the ET claims that we lodged on behalf of five ex-members who were compulsorily retired by the application of Regulation A19 (Police Pension Regulations) nearly two years ago. A copy of the full judgement is linked below.
The ET Judges have unanimously ruled that the application of Regulation applique market A19 against our former members in Devon and Cornwall, West Midlands, applique market North Wales, South Wales and Nottinghamshire was “ not a proportionate means of pursuing a legitimate objective ” applique market and that our ex-members were all unlawfully discriminated against on the grounds of their age.
This is a very welcome judgement, but in many ways there are no winners. All of the five ex-members concerned were forced to retire against their wishes when at the pinnacle of their careers and receiving outstanding appraisals for their performance. Some of them have not worked since being forced to retire.
The Chiefs concerned now have an opportunity to consider the 75 page judgement with their legal advisers and they have the right to appeal or seek to settle these claims. There are a further 22 cases which we have registered on behalf of ex-members which were “stayed” pending the result of the test cases which can now proceed.
Twitter: policesupers applique market RT @SolPolCommander : @policesupers thanks for opportunity to influence - contributed my thoughts to both #diversity surveys #LGBT #WomenInP 06:49:27 PM April 17, 2014 from Tweetbot applique market for iOS Reply Retweet Favorite applique market RT @barrackslass : Looking forward to my day with @policesupers from @iompolice : @ChInspSimonLowe & Kevin Willson, also mtgs with @CCGaryRob 08:06:33 AM April 17, 2014 from Tweetbot for iOS Reply Retweet Favorite RT @PoliceP : Forces in handcuffs over lack of radical restructure says @barrackslass http://t.co/HSIY4ab6YI 11:53:16 AM April 16, 2014 from Tweetbot for iOS Reply Retweet Favorite
Archives April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012
Designed & Developed by adrich
No comments:
Post a Comment